Stephanie Gets Tough on Spam…

The "Stephanie Adams" Series:
  1. Look, Ma! I’m a Web Designer!
  2. Web Designing in the Nude…
  3. A Figment of My Imagination…
  4. Stephanie Adams is Wacko…
  5. Stephanie Adams, Psychopath…
  6. Stephanie Gets Tough on Spam…
  7. Stephanie Adams is Back…
  8. A Letter to Playboy Enterprises…
  9. Go Away, Stephanie Adams!
  10. The Ugly Saga Continues…
  11. Stephanie Threatens to Sue, Again…
  12. A Playmate Provides Evidence…
  13. Stephanie Adams, Lecturer…
  14. Stephanie Threatens my ISP…
  15. Wikipedia Editing Weirdness…

As the few regular visitors to richard’s ramblings… know, Stephanie Adams, Miss November 1992, berated one of my loyal readers for criticizing the colors on her website. Apparently, this isn’t her first time. In March 2001, she received some spam from some unknown, irrelevant-to-this-story company in her TheRomanEmpress@aol.com email box. Since she had repeatedly received this same spam, she decided to do something about it, and searched the Internet for anti-spam information. She found spamNews, a daily journal of news articles about junk e-mail, and sent them a naive email:

Please take the appropriate action to ban this company from the web. They are repeatedly sending SPAM junk mail to me as well as millions of others for their online lotto scam.

That just demonstrates Stephanie’s lack of knowledge about the Internet. How can she expect a private watchdog group to have the power necessary to ban a company from the web?! I thought their reply reasonable — a bit edgy, but reasonable:

Can you explain to me why you are sending this spam to me? I am not some sort of complaint address, and I certainly get enough of my own spam without having to contend with yours.

Well, our good friend, Stephanie, apparently didn’t appreciate that honesty, and promptly retorted:

Well, if you are not a complaint address, then you should not advertise yourself as one! STUPID unprofessional idiots like yourself should not have a web site up of you cannot keep up with your alleged services.

As far as I can see, spamNews doesn’t offer itself up as a complaint address. It’s a popular website detailing information on spam and anti-spam techniques. It doesn’t even offer any anti-spam services! spamNews responded to Stephanie saying so, also offering the invitation that she take up a new hobby, anything not involving computers. As we all know, Stephanie doesn’t react very well to criticism, and I apologize in advance for the foul language in her note back to them:

FÙÇK YOURSELF IN YOUR SHÍTTŸ ÃSSHØLÊ. YOU ACT LIKE SHÍT, YOU SMELL LIKE SHÍT, YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHÍT, SO GO FÙÇK YOURSELF IN YOU ÃSSHØLÊ WHERE SHÍT LIKE YOU BELONGS.

People like you are ugly, poor, uneducated and miserable. Now go jump off a bridge before I investigate you, find you and make you jump off.

Stephanie, always seeming to want the last word twice, sent another email less than three minutes later:

HEY ÇÙNT… Not only are you an áššhølë, but you are a herpes infested torn up ÇÙNT…just like the smelly, fishy, çûm-filled twát that your mother dropped you out of after fûçkìng big black men for $1 a pop from the ghetto you grew up in.

For some reason, I’m still humane enough to wonder what has happened to Stephanie in her past to cause her to be so bitter at the world.

If you liked this, you might also be interested in:

This rambling was posted on May 1, 2002
and filed under Spam Nonsense, Stephanie Adams

Responses

7 Responses to “Stephanie Gets Tough on Spam…”

  1. Response #1
    Stephanie Adams (IP) on August 7th, 2002 at 8:32 am

    You need me to help you with your web site.

    Your colors (blue, white, yellow and periwinkle??) are horrific, your ramblings look like a four-year-old typed it, and your web design looks as if you paid a crack addict to do it.

    You’re the typical waste of humanity that likes to criticize everyone else because you are inadequate in every way - even more than those that you criticize.

    You’re a total failure. Go back and finish high school.

  2. Response #2
    richard on August 7th, 2002 at 10:10 am

    What?! No comment on your “ramblings” above? Hey, at least my site has SOME contrast in order to increase readability. Even though most people like my site, I’ve always stated that I am not following standard web design principles and usability guidelines with my personal site. I’m not selling this as a design, whereas your examples are advertised publicly as samples of your best work. Oh, and if my ramblings look like a four-year-old typed them, it’s because you’ve concentrated on the “articles” I’ve posted that contain copies of your original, ranting emails. So, you can’t blame me for that! - RDL

  3. Response #3
    KD (IP) on August 8th, 2002 at 9:41 am

    Nìggër, you do need help with your web site. You have bad taste in colors, your site looks like you used FrontPage to create it and you can’t spell - I noticed at least 10 grammatical errors on several of your pages. Stephanie’s company employees designed a few web sites for friends of mine and I will tell you, you could not hold a candle up to their incredible work. I’l even throw a few bucks at you to help you pay for her company to re-do the šhìttÿ work you did. You need to go back to school to learn writing, web design and class. If Stephanie knew you wrote this šhìt about her, she would sue you. You áššhølë.

  4. Response #4
    richard on August 8th, 2002 at 10:14 am

    So, you’re done with calling people “shriveled-up trolls”, now you’re on to “nìggër”?

    Show me examples of your excellent web design abilities; tell me how a site LOOKS like it’s been designed with FrontPage. I previously stated that your “vomitous websites were created using Microsoft FrontPage”, as evidenced by the fact that you have <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"> in the code of your websites. How are you determining that mine are created with FrontPage, or even look like they are?

    So which is it? Spelling? Or grammar? They are different, you know. Please tell me what mistakes I have made, and I will gladly fix them. That is one of the differences between you and me. Please show me ten websites that you and your Goddessy “company” have done. If they’re truly “incredible” as you claim, I will publicly say so here on my website. That, too, is another difference between us of which I am proud. Wanna throw me a few bucks? Sure! Send me some money through PayPal. - RDL

  5. Response #5
    Her Original Target (IP) on August 8th, 2002 at 10:55 am

    *sigh*

    Stephanie does know about this site, “KD”. I sent her (that is to say, YOU) the URL to this site months ago.

    And yet, no lawsuit. Wow, I’m so surprised.

  6. Response #6
    richard on August 9th, 2002 at 4:25 pm

    Actually, Original Target, you didn’t send her the URL, but you did quote the site verbatim, even though she claimed YOU were making the entire site up in your head. Some things just don’t change, do they? Her “arguments” are tired and stale. And, all she had to do is search for herself with Google; my website’s been in the top 50 of all “Stephanie Adams” sites for the last four months, and in the top 3 for two of those months. - RDL

  7. Response #7
    Ben (IP) on July 4th, 2003 at 2:17 pm

    I wonder if she’s bi-polar or schizophrenic. Her crazy outbursts remind of the çráp Mike Tyson does. Just all fine and dandy and then BAM total psycho. Like a light switch turning on. For someone who is all into ‘peace and love’ on her site, she sure does insult people.

    And what’s with all of the ‘you’re just the typical ugly blah blah blah’ comments. That’s a real general statement that makes me think she hates everything in the world but herself. Wouldn’t be surprised if she runs someone over with her car one day, or lights someone’s house on fire. har har!

Contribute to the Conversation: