Stephanie Adams, Psychopath…
- Look, Ma! I’m a Web Designer!
- Web Designing in the Nude…
- A Figment of My Imagination…
- Stephanie Adams is Wacko…
- Stephanie Adams, Psychopath…
- Stephanie Gets Tough on Spam…
- Stephanie Adams is Back…
- A Letter to Playboy Enterprises…
- Go Away, Stephanie Adams!
- The Ugly Saga Continues…
- Stephanie Threatens to Sue, Again…
- A Playmate Provides Evidence…
- Stephanie Adams, Lecturer…
- Stephanie Threatens my ISP…
- Wikipedia Editing Weirdness…
“Help! I’m Being Stalked by a Playboy Bunny!”
I’d love to see that headline on newsstands, emblazoned across the top of the latest issue of the National Enquirer. It is only my restraint in protecting my loyal reader who has been threatened with bodily harm from Stephanie Adams, Miss November 1992, that I have not done so already. Although, if and when he ever grants me permission, I will jump at the opportunity.
Stephanie is continuing to send emails without provocation on my reader’s part. The latest:
Thought you should know…
My Uncle’s best guy (who works for him) moved to Mountain View, California today. You see, he got this great job at [your company] and will be giving a “hands on approach” to the employees there. Isn’t that wonderful?
Have a nice day… and do be careful. I hear that the area you live in is not too safe.
California Penal Code Section 422 states, “Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family’s safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison.”
Stephanie, be very careful and reconsider before you send any more nasty emails, unless your fantasy is to actually live some of those girl-girl jailhouse porns in which so many of you Playmates appear.
I think I hear Big Betty calling out your name in her lustful dreams…
That makes 5 rambles on Stephanie so far. Wouldn’t it be nice if we actually get a sixth entitled “Stephanie, the Jailbird”?
It does appear that someone is doing Stephanie’s homework for her, though, it’s probably not the first time. Shouldn’t she be apologizing right about now? It’s now blatantly obvious that she was mistaken about the identity of the constructive critic whom she thought was “Mario’s jew friend.”
I guess her puppet friend didn’t explain that IP headers are traceable in both directions. [Insert sound of 2x4 whacking Stephanie upside the head.] Now Stephanie, do you really believe that you can testify to knowing nothing? [Insert sound of gavel convicting Stephanie of contempt of court, perjury, slander, libel, battery, and a number of others.] Now Stephanie, was it really that hard on you to hear that “blue on black” is hard to read? Even if it is supposed to be “blue on navy” like she claims. Does it really matter?
Here, Stephanie, can you read this?
PULL YOUR HEAD OUT!!!
How de we know the person writing these emails is in fact Stephanie Adams? It would hardly be the first time someone lied over the internet.
1. Because the messages came from her email address. (Yes, I know that can be faked but see #2.)
2. Because they responded to messages send directly to her email address.
3. Because the headers trace back to her service providers.
4. Because a single phone call made to her number prompted a new slew of postings.
5. Because…
6. Because…
7. Because…
Believe me, there is absolutely no doubt that Stephanie is the direct source of all of the messages.
Despite all this, I still think she is gorgeous, and I would like to meet her. It’s not likely, of course.
Bruce - Be grateful for small favors.
Not only is her web design less than spectacular, but her grammar needs some improvement. Have you read her article: “Loving Our Soul“? In the second or third paragraph she says: “It is the purist, yet most evocative emotion in the world.” She should have written “purest,” and there is no need for a comma in this sentence. A comma would be used to separate two sentences in a compound sentence. Here she simply has two adjectives. Despite everything, she’s still a succulent, sizzling succubus.
You are correct that she misused “purist” in place of “purest”, but the use of the comma is acceptable, even preferred. Your use of “succubus” is an interesting one: a succubus is a demoness from Hëll whose sole purpose is to drain the souls of men… How appropriate! - RDL
personally, i don’t think this bìtçh is worth the time or grey matter, it definitely isn’t being reciprocated.
There are all too many people out there who are not open to anything new, closed to all but there own previous experiences and happy to answer anything with a šhìttÿ retort worthy of high schooler (not that we can get down on her for that, i doubt she’s ever had to use her brain for much.)
In the end, Stephanie Adams will continue to get what she wants because she’s a fox (i haven’t seen pics, but she was a playmate of the year [mind you, we had this stripper once who said she was something similar but that's a whole other story]) and that’s the way the world operates.
The funny thing to me and again i haven’t looked is the fact she’s running some sort of inner-harmony instruction site, when the bìtçh seems so insecure, short-fused and without balance she should be shot… i guess when you were a playmate of the year, you can use your looks to market whatever you want, people will still buy it, respect to her (or her minders) for having some sort of business brain.
I should talk to some of my stockbroking friends about silicon implants; the return on those things would be ridiculous.
Tim, Stephanie Adams was NOT Playmate of the Year for 1992–Anna Nicole Smith was. Ms. Adams was a Playmate only.
I found these interesting (character displaying) articles after reading a similar one on msnbc.com: CNN, Earthlink, and Free Advice. Also found her myspace page.