Stephanie Adams is Back…

Yes, Stephanie has returned! The deranged Playmate, her ill-gotten claim to fame being sprawled spread-eagled on the pages of the November 1992 issue of Playboy, has focused her venom on RR…, posting a dozen or so ramblings in her own infamous style, spewing her unwarranted filth across the comment section of my “personal” Internet. Her departures from sanity and intelligent thinking are an unwelcome respite, a pox on society.

A few things you seem to forget, oh darling Stephanie: (1) The posts you publish and the emails you send are all directly traceable to you; (2) no matter what your opinion is about my ramblings, they are read by thousands of people every month from over 50 countries around the world, a testimony to the perceived quality of what you are reading here. As entertaining as big-name shows such as Big Brother and the Anna Nicole Smith Show may be, they serve only to provide a glimpse into the daily lives of ordinary (or, in the case of Anna Nicole, a bit bizarre) people, as do my ramblings, to a lesser degree, perhaps explaining their mediocre popularity among the masses. People are fascinated by the everyday experienced by random individuals, sometimes even more so when those same individuals are apparently down-trodden by those who’ve already experienced their 15 minutes of fame. Even Johnny Depp, the Dalai Lama, and Alec Baldwin are often synonymized with attacking photographers, cameraman, and other ordinary people living ordinary lives.

However, I refuse to be stepped upon. Discontinue your tirades, Stephanie! You are only sullying your own reputation by continuing. As usual, I will voice my opinions, my thoughts, my ideas, the right given to me by the First Amendment, the cornerstone of democracy and freedom in the United States. You have the right to continue your blatherings by the same right, but a “public figure” such as you should endeavor to retain her esteem within society, not dirty it. Your vulgarities are meaningless to me, but, unlike my reader who was lambasted in your early rantings, I will not hesitate to involve the authorities if you harass, slander, or threaten me or my family. Be warned.

On to a hopefully more interesting topic:

The Sheraton Vistana has redeemed itself, at least in the short term. When we checked out last Sunday, our account balance was only eleven dollars and change, a far cry from the original hundreds of dollars that had been charged to the room. Paulette Temple and the rest of the resort’s management honored my forceful request to change rooms and be credited for the entire first week. At least, I hope so! My only concern is that the previous charges didn’t show up on the folio accompanied by an appropriate credit, their absence possibly due to the room change, and I have a feeling I may receive a separate bill for the remainder. Of course, I won’t pay it even if it does arrive because of the extenuating circumstances, but, in the meantime, Sheraton appears to have made amends.

If you liked this, you might also be interested in:

Responses

4 Responses to “Stephanie Adams is Back…”

  1. Response #1
    Lurker… (IP) on August 7th, 2002 at 11:41 pm

    Poor Stephanie. It’s quite obvious she doesn’t feel much love in her life, so she fills the void by harassing you instead. It’s a cry for help, Rich. While the rest of her body has grown older and matured, her brain function must have stalled at 12 years old. At any rate, I have a creeping feeling if this goes on longer than it should, this might actually make some strange tabloid fodder or on the next Access Hollywood. Which is probably what Stephanie wants. She’s probably aware that your site does generate large traffic, and like Anna Nicole Smith, thinks any publicity (no matter how horrendously freakish) is good publicity.

  2. Response #2
    Doug (IP) on August 8th, 2002 at 4:40 am

    What a wacko.

  3. Response #3
    Concerned Citizen (IP) on August 8th, 2002 at 7:37 am

    I think Stephanie needs to seek some serious professional help. She talks about others not having anything better to do and yet she has enough time to dig into the depths of her pathetic brain and resort to vulgar name calling. We have witnessed that Stephanie has a very limited vocabulary and makes the same slanderous comments time after time. If she read a book or looked in a dictionary once in a while she might actually learn something. Or, she can keep reading these ramblings and learn from them as they are written with exceptional vocabulary and without profanity.

  4. Response #4
    Her Original Target (IP) on August 8th, 2002 at 9:13 am

    Oh… my… God! She’s back! When she threatened to cut off my hands, (Literally. That’s what she wrote.) I didn’t really believe her. When the threats escalated from there I decided I felt more sorry for her than threatened by her. So I let the correspondence drop. The last message was on May 1. Now, out of the blue, she’s back. And staying true to form, I see. Stephanie, if you’re reading this I strongly suggest you drop it. Richard is far less tolerant and forgiving than I, especially where threats and insults to his family are concerned. You ARE breaking the law (Remember, I sent you the text.) and he WILL call the cops.

Contribute to the Conversation: