Stephanie Threatens my ISP…
- Look, Ma! I’m a Web Designer!
- Web Designing in the Nude…
- A Figment of My Imagination…
- Stephanie Adams is Wacko…
- Stephanie Adams, Psychopath…
- Stephanie Gets Tough on Spam…
- Stephanie Adams is Back…
- A Letter to Playboy Enterprises…
- Go Away, Stephanie Adams!
- The Ugly Saga Continues…
- Stephanie Threatens to Sue, Again…
- A Playmate Provides Evidence…
- Stephanie Adams, Lecturer…
- Stephanie Threatens my ISP…
- Wikipedia Editing Weirdness…
Stephanie Adams is at it again.
This time, it appears that Stephanie (the late-night Goddessy Legal Department) has taken a break from editing the Wikipedia page about herself, has copied some legal-sounding phrases written by her previous attorney from his failed attempts to silence James Poling’s metadish gossip website, and has pasted them in a rant to my ISP in yet another attempt to silence the truth.
Of course, the most fabulous attorney in New York City, Neal “Quick Draw” Johnston, has been notified…
We are reporting the web site richardsramblings.com, owned by cyberstalker Richard LeCour of lecour.net, for abuse and have provided an outline of his libelous, defamatory slurs against celebrity model Stephanie Adams as follows:
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?cat=3
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?cat=3&paged=2
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?cat=3&paged=3
LeCour has a direct link from lecour.net to richardsramblings.com, which is why we are contacting both web providers, to have both web providers remove the defamatory comments.
Detailed examples of his numerous, bizarre postings are as follows and must be removed from his web site immediately:
Look, Ma! I?m a Web Designer!
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=30
- Link to the personal e-mail address Sorceress@GODDESSY.com created for GODDESSY.com by Stephanie Adams must be removed.
Web Designing in the Nude?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=33
- Link to the personal e-mail address Sorceress@GODDESSY.com created for GODDESSY.com by Stephanie Adams must be removed.
- LeCour wrote libelous comments, stating that Stephanie Adams wrote racially charged responses to someone personally.
- His comment “she just pìššëd me off because she insulted one of my readers, who just happens to be one of my best friends” is false, as Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- His comment regarding his friend stating that Miss Adams “pìššëd him off by disparaging his reproductive organ!!!” is also false. Again, Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
A Figment of My Imagination?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=35
- His statment “Apparently, Miss November 1992, owner of the Goddessy website, is at it again” is also false, as yet again, Miss Adams never
corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.- His comment “According to Stephanie?s boastful email” is also false, as Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with
him.Stephanie Adams is Wacko?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=42
- Just the title of this posting alone is libelous and has to be removed.
- His comment “Stephanie Adams, Playboy?s Miss November 1992, has been sending abusive and threatening emails to a reader of richard?s ramblings” is absolutely, unequivocably, liebelously false and must be removed immediately. Once again, Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- His stement “Despite her nastiness, my reader and friend responded much more civilly than our Bunny” also has tobe removed because, again, Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- The entire paragraph “Once again, his reply to her hateful emails possessed clarity and poise, while managing to stay above the levels to which Stephanie had sunk, albeit a tad more personal. Apparently, Miss Adams can?t quite deal with looking in the mirror, as demonstrated by her reply, which I am no longer censoring in order to provide the full effect of the venom of her responses” must also be removed, as Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, including the following “Unbelievable!! Now she?s threatening him with physical violence!”. Once again, Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- Further comments such as:
– How unfortunate a life Stephanie leads that she must resort to bad language, insults, and threats of violence.
– Stephanie?s paranoia and violent tendencies.
– etc. support th fact that this entire posting must be removed.
Stephanie Adams, Psychopath?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=43
- Just the title of this posting alone is libelous and has to be removed.
- His comment “Help! I?m Being Stalked by a Playboy Bunny!” refers to Miss Adams, making it absolutely false. Miss Adams does not know LeCour and does not want to know LeCour.
- His statement “my loyal reader who has been threatened with bodily harm from Stephanie Adams, Miss November 1992″ is an absolute lie and is libelous to Miss Adams’ character as a media personality. Again, Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- His comment “Stephanie is continuing to send emails without provocation on my reader?s part” is also a lie, as Miss Adams never corresponded with LeCour or anyone associated with him.
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
You?ve Got Mail?
- His statement “As regular visitors to richard?s ramblings? know, Stephanie Adams, Miss November 1992, berated one of my loyal readers for criticizing the colors on her website. This isn?t her first time” is absolutely false and has to be removed immediately.
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
Stephanie Adams is Back?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=115
The entire paragraph in the beginning of this article is filled with false, libelous, defamatory comments. “Yes, Stephanie has returned! The deranged Playmate, her ill-gotten claim to fame being sprawled spread-eagled on the pages of the November 1992 issue of Playboy, has focused her venom on richard?s ramblings?, posting a dozen or so ramblings in her own infamous style, spewing her unwarranted filth across the comment section of my ?personal? Internet. Her departures from sanity and intelligent thinking are an unwelcome respite, a pox on society.”
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
A Letter to Playboy Enterprises?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=116
- The statement “Stephanie Adams, Miss November 1992, is publicly sullying the name of Playboy Enterprises and all it stands for with her current actions” is highly false and libelous, as it is a direct attempt to defame the character and livelihood of Miss Adams.
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
Go Away, Stephanie Adams!
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=118
- Referring to Miss Adams as a “psychotic criminal” is absolutely false. Miss Adams does not have a criminal record and never had one. Miss Adams also does not have a psychiatric issue or never had one.
- In fact, this entire posting contains false information, with several paragraphs of lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
The Ugly Saga Continues?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=154
- LeCour clearly states “I welcome suggestions by Stephanie and her counsel as to which specific sections they mistakenly refer to as libelous and defamatory, and I would be happy to work with them to reword those sections.”
- In fact, all of his postings about Stephanie Adams contain false information, with numerous, countless lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
Stephanie Threatens to Sue, Again?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=465
- In this blog, his links to his friends who are also posting defamatory lies about Miss Adams should be removed as well.
A Playmate Provides Evidence?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=473
- His comment “Stephanie?s and counsel?s subsequent decision to sue blognyc.net for expressing similar truths, far from discouraging me from re-enabling access, actually encouraged me to re-exercise my free-speech rights which supercede Stephanie?s right of publicity. The appropriate action quickly was determined to be to reinstate access to the pages, eliminating the need for a response” contains libel as well, considering the fact that mostly all of his alleged “truths” are false lies.
- In fact, the rest of this blog about Stephanie Adams contains false information, with numerous, countless lies and comments that Miss Adams allegedly made, and should be removed entirely.
Stephanie Adams, Lecturer?
http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=492
- Referred to Miss Adams as an “opponent” and went on to refer to her as an “unworthy” one. Miss Adams does not know LeCour and does not want to know LeCour, let alone be some sort of bizarre “opponent” with him. We are not playing games here.
- LeCour referred to Miss Adams relaying “two failed attempts” at him personally. That statement is absolutely false and constitutes libel in the court of law. Again, Miss Adams does not know LeCour and does not want to know LeCour. His fictitious lies must be removed.
- His comment “She cascaded downhill from there” is also a false statement. Since her modeling career with Playboy, Miss Adams has become the author of 16 books, a contributing editor for 10 publications, an advocate for gay rights, a spokemodel for a fashion line and a celebrity model for calendars,. His comment has no basis, making it libelous.
In conclusion, Richard LeCour’s blogs, posting, lies and other libelous, defmatory ramblings must be removed immediately or his web site should be removed immediately.
We recommend you remove this domain from your company, as we are in the process of taking legal action and will include you, the web server, if you do not comply.
Sincerely,
GODDESSY Legal Department
To pick just one small sample from the list provided, she complains that:
On the contrary, it is Stephanie’s statement that is an absolute lie. As the “loyal reader” to which this refers I can provide copies of the emails Stephanie sent to me from her in which she threatened to chop off my hands and clearly stated that a relative of hers had taken a job at my company for the express purpose of harassing me and destroying my career. Stephanie likes to use aliases so I’d have to triple check to be completely positive, but I’m sure these came from her own email address.
I’ve had enough of this šhìt. I wonder how she would respond to a suit for libel against her. Seriously considering it.
The entire email she sent to the ISP is an utterance of one lie after another which, I’m sure, is why the letter did not come from a real attorney. Even if you overlook the misuse of legal terms, a real attorney might have at least put it through a spellchecker first (”statment”, “liebelously”, “stement”, and “defmatory” to point out a few mistakes). Not the least of the lies:
Now she’s denying that she has twice threatened to sue me, and then failed to do so? I’m pretty sure I can prove that; I have the gonna-sue-you letters from her two different attorneys that are no longer pursuing any suits!!
Yup, SA (stands for “someone anonymous”) is at it again.
Multiple anonymous postings to Wikipedia accusing me (baselessly) of vandalism. And then SA goes on to vandalize of the article about a person who happens to share my name.
At least SA’s consistent in their hypocracy.
Hard to believe that I might be defending her, but the edits on Wikipedia to the Sean Martin page might not be from her despite the fact that they also come from New York (possibly Long Island). Every second or so, it seems that some school kid vandalizes a random page with very similar comments. Every now and then I spend a few minutes reverting the idiocy, always signing my name. However, the anonymous charges of wikivandalism are most likely from her.
An excerpt of an email I received recently:
ROFLMAO!
Looks like I need to update my Devowelizer plugin as it seems to have missed “batshit”. Seems like a relatively common term in this context.
Over on Wikipedia an SA sock puppet recently told people to Google her name and mine so they could see the supposed “vendetta” I have against all things Stephanie. (I whole heartedly supported this suggestion, BTW. Just another action she takes that will backfire on her.)
I should have suggested they also Google her name with “batshit”. Twice as many hits as her name with mine.
Holy çráp the batshit crazy bìtçh is back. This chick needs a judge to let her know that her behaviour is unacceptable and in some states might be considered terroristic threatening.
She certainly appears to have crossed the line for harassment.
I learned about this whole crazy mess from Fark.com and a link to the then BlogNYC site. I have since enjoyed the periodic updates.
I had a neighbor who reminds me of this crazy bìtçh. He sued me and claimed harassment but the judge literally told him that she thought he was a liar and awarded me legal fees. He has now gone on to claim that a police officer harrassed him and is attempting to sue the police dept.
Frciking sociopaths are all alike.
Anyway good luck and I would consider getting a restraining order against this woman if I were you.
Stephanie Adams reminds me of net.kook Gordon Roy Parker. Google his name if you want to learn about his lawsuit against Google for TEN! BILLION! DOLLARS!. Parker posts to Usenet under the name ‘Ray Gordon’. I wonder if these two have ever met? Maybe we should introduce them to each other so they can sue each other.